THE BRIEF [Sep 26-Oct 2’22]
177 countries late with UN climate plans, the Clean Energy Acceleration, carbon emissions = carbon pollution, more methane emissions unaccounted for.
Welcome to this week’s edition of The Weekly Climate 🎉
If you’re only getting The Brief but want to get the full version of the newsletter be sure to upgrade your plan to paid. Check out the preview that you will receive to see why more than 30 people think it’s worth paying for. And see a recent week’s full newsletter for details for why I decided to go paid.
If you’re getting both: Thank you so much for deciding to upgrade to go paid 🙏. And thanks to everybody for reading my newsletter regardless of which version you read 🤗.
‼️News you can’t miss
Here’s one important scary/bad (🙀), good (😻), interesting (😼) and fossil (💩) news item.
🙀 Only 23 out of 200 countries submitted updated climate plans to the UN in time.
💩 The fossil fuel industry’s emissions of methane is even larger than their already misreported numbers
This week’s highlights
[#nordstream] — We humans have a tendency to take notice of big events. Plane crashes makes us irrationally afraid of flying even though flying is much safer than driving and a big methane release from a sabotaged pipeline (Nord Stream) makes us think this is a massive release. When truth be told the Nord Stream sabotage is responsible for a tiny fraction of the fossil fuel industry’s total annual accidental release of methane and other greenhouse gases. Even though that may be true the climate risk from this event is not to be taken lightly as the estimated methane release from the event is estimated to be the same as driving 1.3M cars for a year.
[#naturerinsing] — Here’s a new term you’d better get used to: Nature-rinsing. It’s when a polluting company uses beautiful images of nature and animals to make their dirty products look cleaner. Airlines and companies making SUVs are really good at this.
[#lossdamage] — Last week we mentioned that Denmark was the first country to put aside an amount of money to pay for “loss and damage” as a result of climate change for vulnerable nations. But what is “loss and damage” actually? This Carbon Brief article goes much deeper. And here’s a timeline of the “loss and damage” topic in UN climate talks also produced by Carbon Brief.
That’s it for this week folks!
If you want more details or simply think my newsletter rocks remember that you can always go paid to get the full version of the Weekly Climate. But before you do, ask yourself this question: Does it provide you with 1.25$ worth of value every week? Obviously I think it does. In fact I really hope that just the time alone I save you should easily cover those 1.25$. Don’t hesitate to ping me on firstname.lastname@example.org or comment below with any questions, feedback or comments regarding this.
Remember if you’re feeling down, angry or sad from some of the news in this newsletter one cure is to act. And one way you can always act that also happens to be one of the most powerful things you can do is to talk about it. That also works if what you just read made you hopeful or happy btw.
If you enjoyed this newsletter don’t forget to share it with your friends, coworkers or other people you think could benefit from getting it. If you got directed here by a friend or another link on the Internet don’t forget to subscribe!
See you all next week 👋