Welcome to this week’s edition of The Weekly Climate 🎉

References: [1], [2], [3], [4] and [5].

If you’re only getting The Brief but want to get the full version of the newsletter be sure to upgrade your plan to paid. Check out the preview that you will receive to see why more than 30 people think it’s worth paying for. And see a recent week’s full newsletter for details for why I decided to go paid.

If you’re getting both: Thank you so much for deciding to upgrade to go paid 🙏. And thanks to everybody for reading my newsletter regardless of which version you read 🤗.

Remember I’m running an offer for the next month where you can get 25% off an annual subscription to the paid version. 🤩

Get 25% off forever

‼️News you can’t miss

Here’s one important scary/bad (🙀), good (😻), interesting (😼) and fossil (💩) news item.

🙀 Banks still investing heavily in the fossil fuel industry despite pledges

😻 100B$ expected to be invested in EV chargers this year

😼 Surely lots of rain in an area affected by drought must be a good thing, right?

💩 Propane industry to spend 12.8M$ this year in propaganda for pushing propane as a climate solution

This week’s highlights

[#dust] — A new study has determined that dust in the atmosphere is likely hiding some of the effects of climate change. The study concludes that temperatures could be up to 8% warmer if the dust weren’t there.

[#gasstoves] — If you’re tired of all the talks about gas stoves (which you may be if you’re reading this in the US - but if you need a quick refresher check this video out) then Heated presents a very good and important line of arguments as to why gas stoves actually matter even though their carbon footprint is crazy significant. And then again it does indeed matter since gas stoves comes with a leaky fossil fuel infrastructure. Emily draws an interesting line between people against plastic straws and gas stoves that follows a similar line of reasoning.

[#davos] — As described in the last issue I’ve permanently removed the policy section here, so any policy news worth discussing will be posted in the relevant categories already present or in the Other category as in this case. Here goes: Davos was last week. And climatewise I think UNs head Gutierrez said it best (quote this article):

“Just like the tobacco industry, they (fossil fuel industry which is represented big time at Davos, red.) rode roughshod over their own science. Big Oil peddled the big lie. And like the tobacco industry, those responsible must be held to account. Today, fossil fuel producers and their enablers are still racing to expand production, knowing full well that their business model is inconsistent with human survival. This insanity belongs in science fiction, yet we know the ecosystem meltdown is cold, hard scientific fact.”

Subscribe now

That’s it for this week folks!

If you want more details or simply think my newsletter rocks remember that you can always go paid to get the full version of the Weekly Climate. But before you do, ask yourself this question: Does it provide you with 1.25$ worth of value every week? Obviously I think it does. In fact I really hope that just the time alone I save you should easily cover those 1.25$. Don’t hesitate to ping me on michael@weeklyclimate.com or comment below with any questions, feedback or comments regarding this.

Remember if you’re feeling down, angry or sad from some of the news in this newsletter one cure is to act. And one way you can always act that also happens to be one of the most powerful things you can do is to talk about it. That also works if what you just read made you hopeful or happy btw.

Share

If you enjoyed this newsletter don’t forget to share it with your friends, coworkers or other people you think could benefit from getting it. If you got directed here by a friend or another link on the Internet don’t forget to subscribe!

See you all next week 👋

Subscribe now

The Weekly Climate

THE BRIEF [Jan 16-22’23]